WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Northern Sold 3:55 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Ha Ha.... hi jacked by the neo Nazis!!!

https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8610

The Dursley Massive 3:54 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Even Turing couldn't decode that Soldo.

Northern Sold 3:52 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
She sounds GREAT



Hunt’s new film, avail­able on YouTube, is a sup­posed “debunk­ing” of the doc­u­men­tary Tre­blinka: Hitler’s Killing Machine, which aired on the Smith­son­ian Chan­nel in the U.S. and Chan­nel 5 in the UK.

In The Tre­blinka Archae­ol­ogy Hoax, Hunt uses clips of Holo­caust sur­vivors’ tes­ti­monies from the USC Shoah Foun­da­tion Insti­tute for Visual His­tory and Edu­ca­tion (estab­lished by Steven Spiel­berg in 1994) to make his claim that gas cham­bers at Tre­blinka and Maj­danek, two camps Hunt vis­ited in mak­ing his film, were not used to sys­tem­at­i­cally kill Jews but rather were used as “life-saving shower rooms.”

Hunt sim­i­larly used such clips from sur­vivors in his pre­vi­ous films, includ­ing The Jew­ish Gas Cham­ber Hoax, which cre­ated buzz within the Holo­caust denial move­ment in March. He describes the USC Shoah Foun­da­tion Insti­tute for Visual His­tory and Edu­ca­tion as a “trea­sure trove for revisionists.”

Hunt pro­moted his film on the April 27 episode of Spin­gola Speaks, an online radio pro­gram hosted by anti-Semitic con­spir­acy the­o­rist Deanna Spin­gola. Hunt elab­o­rated on claims he pre­sented in The Tre­blinka Archae­ol­ogy Hoax, stat­ing that the Holo­caust is “a bla­tant hoax…a damned dirty hoax; it’s a big lie.”

While Hunt claims the Holo­caust is a “hoax,” he describes the death camps as “work camps” where the Jews got what they deserved. Hunt states that the Jews in the camps “were liv­ing off inter­est rates, usury, etc. and if you read Mein Kampf, of course, basi­cally Hitler said that they should be work­ing. They shouldn’t be liv­ing off peo­ple they’re scamming.”

In the inter­view, Hunt also calls for action against “the Holo­caust indus­try,” stat­ing, “I don’t under­stand why we don’t sue some of them. Why don’t we bring them to court and have them stand trial, have them explain them­selves?” He claims he has “actu­ally sued Spiel­berg over his Holo­caust lies.” Hunt also asks lis­ten­ers to con­tact Car­o­line Sturdy Colls, the foren­sic arche­ol­o­gist who appears in Tre­blinka: Hitler’s Killing Machine, and to “hold her account­able for her hoaxing.”

In both The Tre­blinka Archae­ol­ogy Hoax and in his inter­view with Spin­gola, Hunt alleges the sup­posed Jewish-controlled media has manip­u­lated pub­lic opin­ion to believe in the Holo­caust hoax as part of a larger con­spir­acy. Hunt also said that his next “doc­u­men­tary” will likely focus on this alleged Jew­ish con­trol of the media and will “blow the lid off of this Jew­ish Hol­ly­wood mafia involved in a lot of this propaganda.”

The Cult Of Bob 3:43 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Northern Sold 3:41 Sat Mar 14

The amount of YELLOW on that page hurt my eyes.

Northern Sold 3:41 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Deanna Spingola?? Is that the bird who champions Justice4Germans??? Ag Ag Ag!!

http://justice4germans.com/third-reich/

Hows your Brown shirt today GO.... nice and starchy I hope??

The Dursley Massive 3:36 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Blossom

Good post.

The other danger at the moment is that a few nutjobs that lack any credible evidence seem to get the same media attention and airtime as THOUSANDS of evidence based experts; see Climate Change, Vaccination as a couple of examples.

It's not just with Science either. Political parties have an increasing number of policies guided by popularity with voters rather than listening to expert opinions. Scary.

Golden Oldie 2:58 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Cholo, white supremacist?

In the fact she's white and tells the truth?

Nothing to do with the colour of her skin.
Though everything to do with the ethnic hatred you appear to have for her colour.

Darby_ 2:34 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Does she say that vaccinations are all part of the Zionist conspiracy?

cholo 2:29 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Golden Oldie 1:50 Sat Mar 14


White supremacist loon Deanna Spingola?


Haha

Blossom 2:07 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Ron,
There is no mercury in any vaccinations and never has been. What I assume you are referring to is Thiomersal, which is a chemical compound of mercury in combination with other elements.
Similarly, water is made up of hydrogen and oxygen gases but no-one would suggest that water is chemically similar to hydrogen!
The trouble is, people see "mercury" and react to that, without any scientific understanding of the science.
Yes, thiomersal in sufficient dosage is toxic (so is water...remember Leah Betts?) but has always been deemed to be safe at the levels administered in a vaccination (lower than normal environmental exposure to mercury compounds).
Nevertheless, due to public concerns (rather than any proven problem), it is no longer used except in very few vaccines e.g. for snake venom which are stored for a very long time as rarely needed....

You see why those of a scientific bent get so angry....freedom of speech is all very well (I'm all for it) but with that comes responsibility.....people die because of the lack of vaccinations......and that person is often not the person who chose not to vaccinate their child or to be vaccinated themself, but a random individual who came into contact with that unvaccinated person.....

Hermit Road 2:02 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
She sounds like a bit of loon, for that reason I'm in complete agreement with Ron's choice of thread title.

Golden Oldie 1:50 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Ron
There's a great author and radio host called Deanna Spingola who has a strong background in medicine who has interviewed 100's of pharmaceutical experts about vaccinations and their links to autism and all kinds of devastating side effects.

Most vaccines/drugs get through the clinical trials not through the success and safety (many of them are not) of the product but through strong-arm economic pressures and corporate greed.

She's worth listening to if you've never heard of her, she covers all kinds of matters from bent history to bent science.

http://www.spingola.com/Critical%20Analysis%20of%20an%20FDA%20document.pdf

Bungo 1:45 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Monk~koknee 1:38 Sat Mar 14

It's actually gone quite silly now it's SO tight.

E.g. We are no longer allowed to distribute ANY branded items, even including post it pads or pens with drug names on to doctors or any other staff in case it unduly influences them to prescribe.

We cannot use certain words such as 'safe' or 'the best' even verbally as these cannot be completely substantiated.

Unless invited to do so, we cannot ring up or email a medical professional to promote a drug or even to ask if we can go and see them to promote a drug if there is any claim made about the drug in the communication.

The list is endless...

Monk~koknee 1:38 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Bungo 1:35 Sat Mar 14

Yes, I am sure you are right about the controls around prescription drugs.

Monk~koknee 1:36 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
My only interest in this is to say that she has the right to make her case. As, in my opinion, would be someone who wanted to claim that cigarettes were not harmful to health. You can't have freedom and then decide to who it should apply.

The comparison you make is not a valid one in my opinion. If I am selling a product I should naturally have a responsibility for its safety. If I want to campaign against a product I have no such responsibility. Are we to ban religious leaders because they cant prove god's existence?

I would have thought we should be adult and sensible enough to be allowed to make our own minds up. In other circumstances people would be screaming 'nanny state' or similar.

Bungo 1:35 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Monk~koknee 1:22 Sat Mar 14

Non-prescription medicines marketed directly to the public are not part of my world and I would suggest that you are probably right that there is some exaggeration and use of superlatives etc going on there.

However I can assure you that marketing of prescription drugs to medical professionals is VERY tightly controlled.

If you have an hour or two to spare reading, here's a link to the code. Clause 7 gives you a flavour of how tightly everything is regulated.

Competing companies also watch each other closely for any breaches and will report each other at the drop of a hat!

http://www.pmcpa.org.uk/thecode/InteractiveCode2015/Pages/default.aspx

cholo 1:29 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
People question pharmacy companies in terms of the claims about their products, which is correct, however there is an industry and legal code they have to abide by, if not they should be punished.

What industry and legal code do anti vaxxers such as this Sherri woman have to abide by to keep their bullshit in check? She gets PAID to tour the world and spread this nonsense don't forget.

Monk~koknee 1:22 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
I'm not having it that Pharma companies always tell the honest truth particularly in the claims made to consumers. Google will lead you to a number of studies made into the extent and scale of misleading drug commercials. Maybe it is different when marketing to medical professionals.

cholo 1:22 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Ron


What if the amount of mercury in vaccinations was negligible in terms of a threat to health?

Caffeine in small doses is lethal, yet millions of people consume it everyday without any ill affect whatsoever.

Bungo 1:16 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Ronald_antly 12:52 Sat Mar 14

I couldn't tell you as I work in a different therapeutic area. Professionally I will only discuss what I am fully trained to discuss.

If you can post a link to properly conducted, peer reviewed research on the subject I will be happy to review it for you.

The Cult Of Bob 12:57 Sat Mar 14
Re: Je suis Sherri.
Bungo.

Ronald demands evidence. COLD, HARD evidence. He won't be swayed by figmental substantiations from grainy youtube videos, oh no.

This guy is a fucking piranha for truth.

Prev - Page 2 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: